光学量子噪声模拟与测量实验研究

量子电子学报

光学量子噪声模拟与测量实验研究

曹连振1,2，刘霞1,2，杨阳1,2，赵加强1,2，逯怀新1,2

1山东省多光子纠缠与操纵重点实验室，山东潍坊 261061； 2潍坊学院物理与光电工程学院，山东潍坊 261061

出版日期:2019-09-28 发布日期:2019-09-18
作者简介:曹连振（1980-），山东聊城人，博士，副教授，研究生导师，主要从事量子信息技术与应用方面的研究。E-mail：lianzhencao@wfu.edu.cn
基金资助:
Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (国家自然科学基金, 11404246), Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (山东省自然科学基金, ZR2018LA4), Higher School Science and Technology Plan of Shandong Province (山东省高等学校科技发展计划，J17KA188)

Experimental study on simulation and measurement of optical quantum noise

CAO Lianzhen1,2 , LIU Xia1,2, YANG Yang1,2, ZHAO Jiaqiang1,2, LU Huaixin1,2

1 Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Multiphoton Entanglement and Manipulation, Weifang 261061, China; 2 Department of Physics and Photoelectric Engineering, Weifang University, Weifang 261061, China

Published:2019-09-28 Online:2019-09-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 光学量子纠缠系统是实现量子信息处理的重要系统之一。纠缠系统与量子噪声不可避免的耦合作用会导致量子信息处理过程的失败，因此研究量子噪声对纠缠系统的影响并得到相应的实验规律非常重要。理论上给出了光学典型量子噪声的性质及物理算符表示，实验上采用不同的光学器件或器件组合成功模拟实现了各种典型的光量子噪声，以量子比特翻转噪声为例研究了噪声对两比特纠缠系统的影响。结果表明对于两比特纠缠系统，当纠缠源的纠缠度相同时，比特翻转噪声相对于相移噪声更易破坏纠缠相干性，而比特位相翻转噪声破坏纠缠特性的能力介于前两者之间。

关键词: 光量子噪声, 实验模拟, 实验测量, 量子比特翻转噪声

Abstract: Optical quantum entanglement system is one of the most important systems for quantum information processing. The inevitable coupling between the entangled system and quantum noise will lead to the failure of the quantum information processing process. Therefore, it is very important to investigate the effect of quantum noise on the entangled system and obtain the corresponding experimental laws. The properties and physical operator representation of optical typical quantum noise are given theoretically. In the experiment, various typical optical quantum noises are successfully simulated by using different optical devices or combination of devices. Taking the quantum bit flip noise as an example, the effect of noise on two qubit entanglement system is studied. Results show that for two qubit entangled systems, when the entanglement degree of the entanglement source is the same, the bit-flip noise is more likely to destroy the entanglement coherence than the phase-shift noise, and the ability of bit-phase-flip noise to destroy the entanglement property is between the former two.

Key words: optical quantum noise, experimental simulation, experimental measurement, quantum bit flip noise

曹连振1,2，刘霞1,2，杨阳1,2，赵加强1,2，逯怀新1,2. 光学量子噪声模拟与测量实验研究[J]. 量子电子学报.

CAO Lianzhen1,2,LIU Xia1,2, YANG Yang1,2, ZHAO Jiaqiang1,2, LU Huaixin1,2. Experimental study on simulation and measurement of optical quantum noise[J]. Chinese Journal of Quantum Electronics.

参考文献

Dür W, Briegel H J. Stability of macroscopic entanglement under decoherence [J]. Physical Review Letters, 2004, 92(18):180403. [2] Aolita L, Chaves R, Cavalcanti D, et al. Scaling laws for the decay of multiqubit entanglement [J]. Physical Review Letters, 2008, 100(8): 080501. [3] Mao Jun, Ma Lei, Influence of entanglement swapping on quantum small-world networks entanglement percolation in noisy scenario [J]. Chinese Journal of Quantum Electronics (量子电子学报), 2018, 35(6): 667-673 (in Chinese). [4] Wang Xiong, Hu Zhanning. Efficient entanglement concentration scheme for partially entangled photon pairs[J]. Chinese Journal of Quantum Electronics (量子电子学报), 2019, 36(2): 182-187(in Chinese). [5] Zhao Jiaqiang, Cao Lianzhen, Yang Yang，et al. Tripartite entanglement and nonlocality in three-photon generalized GHZ states[J]. Chinese Journal of Quantum Electronics (量子电子学报), 2018, 35(5): 583-587(in Chinese). [6] Fulvio F, Nicolò S, Fabio S, Photonic quantum information processing: A review [J]. Reports on Progress in Physics, 2018, 82(1): 016001. [7] Ge W C, Sawyer B C, Britton J W, et al. Trapped ion quantum information processing with squeezed phonons [J]. Physical Review Letters, 2019, 122(3): 030501. [8] Kwiat R G, Berglund A J, Altepeter J B, et al. Experimental verification of decoherence-free subspaces [J]. Science, 2000, 290(5491): 498-501. [9] Lo F R, Bellpmo B, Maniscalco S, et al. Dynamics of quantum correlations in two-qubit systems within non-Markovian environments[J].International Journal of Modern Physics B, 2013, 27: 1345053. [10] Xu Jinshi, Li Chuanfeng, Gong Ming, et al. Measurement-induced quantum coherence recovery [J]. New Journal of Physics, 2009, 11(4): 043010. [11] Almeida M P, DeMelo F, Meyll M H, et al. Environment-induced sudden death of entanglement[J]. Science, 2007, 316(5824): 579-582. [12] Lu He, Chen Luokan, Liu Chang, et al. Experimental realization of a concatenated Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger state for macroscopic quantum superpositions [J]. Nature Photonics, 2014, 8: 364-368. [13] Knoll L, Orlowski A. Distance between density operators: Applications to the Jaynes-Cummings model [J]. Physical Review A, 1995, 51(2): 1622-1630. [14] Vedral V, Plemin M B, Rippin M A, et al. Quantifying entanglement [J]. Physical Review Letters, 1997, 78(12): 2275-2279. [15] Zheng Shibiao, Guo Guangchan. Efficient scheme for two-atom entanglement and quantum information processing in cavity QED [J]. Physical Review Letters, 2000, 85(11): 2392-2395. [16] Zheng Shibiao. One-step synthesis of multiatom Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger states[J]. Physical Review Letters, 2001, 87(23): 230404. [17] Borras A, Majtey A P, Plastino A R, et al. Robustness of highly entangled multiqubit states under decoherence [J]. Physical Review A, 2009, 79(2): 022108. [18] Cao Lianzhen, Zhao Jiaqiang, Liu Xia, et al. Experimental investigation of the information entropic Bell inequality [J]. Scientific Reports, 2016, 6: 23758. [19] Liu Xia, Lu Huaixin, Zhao Jiaqiang, et al. Evolution of quantum correlation undergoing decoherence using the information entropy inequality [J]. Laser Physics Letters, 2018, 15: 125207.