Semi⁃quantum private comparison protocol based on
four⁃particle GHZ state

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-5461.2023.05.012

Abstract

Abstract: The semi-quantum communication protocol allows participants with only limited quantum capabilities to carry out quantum communication. Compared with the full quantum communication protocol, it reduces the loss of quantum resources and saves the costs of quantum hardware. Based on a semi-quantum model, a novel semi-quantum private comparison protocol is proposed with the fourparticle Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger (GHZ) state as the quantum resource state. The protocol can compare the information of two classical users, Alice and Bob, with the help of a semi-honest third party without disclosing their secret information. Security analysis shows that this protocol can resist both internal and external attacks. Compared with the existing semi-quantum private comparison protocol, the classical user in the proposed protocol requires less quantum capability, only needs to perform Z-based measurement and reflect the received particles, and has high quantum bit efficiency. In addition, the proposed protocol is verified by simulation experiments on IBM quantum cloud platform.

Key words: quantum information, quantum cryptography, semi-quantum private comparison, fourparticle GHZ state, IBM quantum cloud platform, semi-honest third party

CLC Number:

O431.2

HUANG Guan , LOU Xiaoping. Semi⁃quantum private comparison protocol based on four⁃particle GHZ state[J]. Chinese Journal of Quantum Electronics, 2023, 40(5): 726-737.

References

[1]. Bennett, C.H. Quantum key distribution and coin tossing. in International Conference on Computers. 1984.
[2]. Qin, S., et al., Distributed secret sharing scheme based on the high-dimensional rotation paraboloid. Journal of Information Security and Applications, 2021. 58: p. 102797.
[3]. Chang, L.W., et al., Multi-layer Quantum Secret Sharing Based on GHZ States. Artificial Intelligence and Security, 6th International Conference, ICAIS 2020, Hohhot, China, July 17–20, 2020, Proceedings, Part I, 2020.
[4]. Hillery, M., V. Nek and A. Berthiaume, Quantum secret sharing. quant-ph/9806063, 1999. 59(3): p. 1829-1834.
[5]. Cui, Z.X., et al., Measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution with hyper-encoding. Science China: Physics, Mechanics and Astronomy, 2019. 62(11).
[6]. Wang, B., et al., A kind of improved quantum key distribution scheme. Optik - International Journal for Light and Electron Optics, 2021. 235: p. 166628.
[7]. Kurt, G.K., et al., A Key Verification Protocol for Quantum Key Distribution. IEEE Access, 2019. PP(99): p. 1-1.
[8]. Bostroem, K., T. Felbinger and H. Hoffmann, Secure direct communication with a quantum one-time pad. Physics, 2004. 69(5): p. 521-524.
[9]. Li, T. and G.L. Long, Quantum secure direct communication based on single-photon Bell-state measurement. New Journal of Physics, 2020. 22(6): p. 063017 (10pp).
[10]. Bebrov, G. and R. Dimova, Efficient Quantum Secure Direct Communication Protocol Based on Quantum Channel Compression. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 2020. 59(2): p. 1-10.
[11]. Huang, Z. and H. Situ, Protection of quantum dialogue affected by quantum field. Quantum Information Processing, 2019. 18(1).
[12]. Zhang, L., et al., A Controller-Independent Quantum Dialogue Protocol with Four-Particle States. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 2019. 58(6): p. 1927-1936.
[13]. Saxena, A., K. Thapliyal and A. Pathak, Continuous variable controlled quantum dialogue and secure multiparty quantum computation. International Journal of Quantum Information, 2020. 18(7): p. 2050009.
[14]. Yang, G. and Y. Wen, An efficient two-party quantum private comparison protocol with decoy photons and two-photon entanglement. Journal of Physics: A Mathematical & Theoretical, 2009.
[15]. Yang, Y.G., W.F. Cao and Q.Y. Wen, Secure quantum private comparison. Physica Scripta, 2009. 80(6): p. 065002.
[16]. Ye, T.Y. and C.Q. Ye, Measure-Resend Semi-Quantum Private Comparison Without Entanglement. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 2018. 57(12): p. 3819-3834.
[17]. Wen, et al., Quantum Private Comparison Protocol Based on Bell Entangled States. Communications in Theoretical Physics, 2012. 57(4): p. 583-583.
[18]. Zhao-Xu, J. and Y. Tian-Yu, Multi-party quantum private comparison based on the entanglement swapping of d-level cat states and d-level Bell states. Quantum Information Processing, 2017. 16(7): p. 177.
[19]. Wu, W.Q. and Y.X. Zhao, Quantum private comparison of size using d-level Bell states with a semi-honest third party. Quantum Information Processing, 2021. 20(4).
[20]. Liu, W. and Y.B. Wang, Quantum Private Comparison Based on GHZ Entangled States. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 2012. 51(11): p. 3596-3604.
[21]. Huang, et al., Multi-Party Quantum Private Comparison Protocol with an Almost-Dishonest Third Party using GHZ States. International Journal of Theoretical Physics: A Journal of Original Research and Reviews in Theoretical Physics and Related Mathematics, Dedicated to the Unification of Physics, 2016.
[22]. Ji, Z., et al., Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger-based quantum private comparison protocol with bit-flipping. Physica Scripta, 2021. 96(1): p. 015103 (12pp).
[23]. Zhang, W.W., D. Li and Y.B. Li, Quantum Private Comparison Protocol with W States. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL PHYSICS, 2014. 53(5): p. 1723-1729.
[24]. Sun, Z. and D. Long, Quantum Private Comparison Protocol Based on Cluster States. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 2013. 52(1): p. 212-218.
[25]. Zhou and Ming-Kuai, Improvements of Quantum Private Comparison Protocol Based on Cluster States. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 2018. 57(1): p. 42-47.
[26]. Ye, T.Y. and Z.X. Ji, Two-Party Quantum Private Comparison with Five-Qubit Entangled States. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 2017. 56(5): p. 1517-1529.
[27]. Wen, L., et al., New Quantum Private Comparison Protocol Using χ-Type State. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 2012. 51(6): p. 1953-1960.
[28]. Hong-Ming and Pan, Quantum Private Comparison Based on χ-Type Entangled States. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 2017. 56(10): p. 3340-3347.
[29]. Quantum Private Comparison of Equal Information Based on Highly Entangled Six-Qubit Genuine State. Communications in Theoretical Physics, 2016.
[30]. Michel, et al., Quantum Key Distribution with Classical Bob. Physical Review Letters, 2007. 99(14): p. 140501-140501.
[31]. Yin, A. and T. Chen, Authenticated Semi-Quantum Secret Sharing Based on GHZ-Type States. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 2021. 60(1): p. 265-273.
[32]. Tsai, C., C. Yang and J. Lin, Multiparty Mediated Semi-Quantum Secret Sharing Protocol. arXiv.org, 2021.
[33]. Tsai, C., C. Yang and N. Lee, Semi-quantum secret sharing protocol using W-state. Modern Physics Letters A, 2019. 34(27): p. 1950213.
[34]. Tsai, C., C. Yang and N. Lee, Lightweight mediated semi-quantum key distribution protocol. Modern Physics Letters A, 2019. 34(34): p. 1950281.
[35]. Lin, P.H., C.W. Tsai and T. Hwang, Mediated Semi‐Quantum Key Distribution Using Single Photons. Annalen der Physik, 2019. 531(8): p. 1800347.
[36]. Hajji, H. and M.E. Baz, Qutrit-based semi-quantum key distribution protocol. Quantum Information Processing, 2021.
[37]. Rong, Z., et al., Mediated semi-quantum secure direct communication. Quantum Information Processing, 2021. 20(2).
[38]. Sun, Y., et al., Two semi-quantum secure direct communication protocols based on Bell states. Modern Physics Letters A, 2019.
[39]. Rong, Z., D. Qiu and X. Zou, Semi-Quantum Secure Direct Communication Using Entanglement. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 2020. 59(5410).
[40]. Lin, P., T. Hwang and C. Tsai, Efficient semi-quantum private comparison using single photons. Quantum Information Processing, 2019. 18(7).
[41]. Jiang, L., Semi-quantum private comparisonbased on Bell states. Quantum Information Processing, 2020. 19(6).
[42]. Zhou, N., et al., Semi-quantum private comparison protocol of size relation with d-dimensional Bell states. Quantum Information Processing, 2021. 20(3).
[43]. Yan, L., et al., Semi-quantum private comparison protocol with three-particle G-like states. Quantum Information Processing, 2021. 20(1).
[44]. Chou, W.H., T. Hwang and J. Gu, Semi-quantum private comparison protocol under an almost-dishonest third party. arXiv preprint arXiv:1607.07961, 2016.
[45]. Xu, Q., et al., Quantum Private Comparison Protocol Based on Four-Particle GHZ States. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 2020. 59(6): p. 1798-1806.
[46]. Chou, W.H., T. Hwang and J. Gu, Semi-quantum private comparison protocol under an almost-dishonest third party. arXiv preprint arXiv:1607.07961, 2016.
[47]. Lin, P., T. Hwang and C. Tsai, Efficient semi-quantum private comparison using single photons. Quantum Information Processing, 2019. 18(7).
[48]. Hong-Ming and Pan, Quantum Private Comparison Based on χ-Type Entangled States. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 2017. 56(10): p. 3340-3347.
[49]. Ye, T.Y. and C.Q. Ye, Measure-Resend Semi-Quantum Private Comparison Without Entanglement. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 2018. 57(12): p. 3819-3834.
[50]. Jiang, L., Semi-quantum private comparisonbased on Bell states. Quantum Information Processing, 2020. 19(6).

Semi⁃quantum private comparison protocol based on four⁃particle GHZ state

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	. Deterministic Entanglement Purification for Decohered Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger State Assisted by Spatial Entanglement [J]. Chinese Journal of Quantum Electronics, 2023, 40(6): 0-0.
[2]	. FPGA-based linear detection and characterization of a microwave coherent source [J]. Chinese Journal of Quantum Electronics, 2023, 40(6): 0-0.
[3]	HU Qianqian , FENG Bao , YAN Longchuan , ZHAO Xiaohong , CHEN Zhiyu , LI Wenting , LI Wei . HU Qianqian 1,2, FENG Bao 1,2, YAN Longchuan 3, ZHAO Xiaohong 4, CHEN Zhiyu 3, LI Wenting 5, LI Wei 5* [J]. Chinese Journal of Quantum Electronics, 2023, 40(5): 712-718.
[4]	ZHANG Bo , QU Diqing , LUO Jun , DU Xiangjian , FANG Yuqiang , JIANG Lianjun , GAO Song , YU Lin , SUN Fang , TANG Shibiao . A defense scheme of pulse illumination attack for quantum key distribution systems [J]. Chinese Journal of Quantum Electronics, 2023, 40(5): 719-725.
[5]	TANG Qimei. Design of quaternary quantum reversible half⁃adder, full⁃adder and parallel adder circuits [J]. Chinese Journal of Quantum Electronics, 2023, 40(5): 759-769.
[6]	JIA Wei , ZHANG Qiangqiang , BIAN Yuxiang , LI Wei . Research on the upper bound of collective attack in E91-QKD [J]. Chinese Journal of Quantum Electronics, 2023, 40(3): 407-414.
[7]	CAO Rui , YUAN Chengzhi , SHEN Si , ZHANG Zichang , FAN Yunru , LI Jiarui , LI Hao , YOU Lixing , ZHOU Qiang , WANG Zizhu ∗. Optimized detection of maximally entangled time-bin qutrits [J]. Chinese Journal of Quantum Electronics, 2023, 40(1): 85-94.
[8]	ZHAO Liangyuan , ∗ , CAO Lingyun , LIANG Hongyuan , WEI Zheng , WU Qianjun , QIAN Jianlin , HAN Zhengfu ∗. Research on wavelength-multiplexed quantum key distribution based on diﬀerent optical ﬁbers [J]. Chinese Journal of Quantum Electronics, 2022, 39(5): 776-785.
[9]	WU Xi, LI Zhiqiang∗. Circuit realization of Grover algorithm based on Cirq [J]. Chinese Journal of Quantum Electronics, 2022, 39(3): 431-438.
[10]	DAI Juan∗, LI Zhiqiang, YANG Donghan. Synthesis of Deutsch-Jozsa circuits based on Cirq [J]. Chinese Journal of Quantum Electronics, 2022, 39(3): 439-445.
[11]	WANG Fangxiang , , CHEN Wei , ∗. High-dimensional quantum key distribution based on orbital angular momentum photons: A review [J]. Chinese Journal of Quantum Electronics, 2022, 39(1): 64-80.
[12]	. Quantum secure multiparty summation based on Bell states [J]. Chinese Journal of Quantum Electronics, 2021, 38(6): 830-837.
[13]	TANG Shibiao∗, CHENG Jie, LI Shuai. Research on random number chip array scheme for quantum key distribution products [J]. Chinese Journal of Quantum Electronics, 2021, 38(4): 468-476.
[14]	FAN Yuteng, SUO Lei, ZHANG Chunhui, CHEN Jiaming, WANG Qin, ∗. Passive decoy-state quantum digital signature scheme based on linear optical components [J]. Chinese Journal of Quantum Electronics, 2021, 38(4): 485-495.
[15]	CHEN Menghan, GUO Gongde, LIN Song∗. Quantum recommendation algorithm based on Hamming distance [J]. Chinese Journal of Quantum Electronics, 2021, 38(3): 332-340.