激光关联成像雷达研究进展与展望

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-5461.2022.06.002

量子电子学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (6): 835-850.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-5461.2022.06.002

激光关联成像雷达研究进展与展望

龚文林1∗ , 陈明亮2 , 韩申生2∗

( 1 苏州大学光电科学与工程学院, 江苏苏州 215006; 2 中国科学院上海光学精密机械研究所量子光学重点实验室, 上海 201800 )

收稿日期:2022-02-18 修回日期:2022-03-03 出版日期:2022-11-28 发布日期:2022-12-14
通讯作者: E-mail: wlgong@suda.edu.cn; sshan@mail.shcnc.ac.cn E-mail:E-mail: wlgong@suda.edu.cn; sshan@mail.shcnc.ac.cn
作者简介:龚文林 ( 1982 - ), 湖北咸宁人, 博士, 教授, 博士生导师, 主要从事光场调控与计算成像研究并探索其在激光成像雷达、显微成像、遥感等领域的应用。 E-mail: wlgong@suda.edu.cn
基金资助:
Supported by Natural Science Research of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions of China (江苏省高等学校自然科学研究项目, 21KJA140001), Aeronautical Science Foundation (航空科学基金, 2020Z073012001)

Research Progress and Prospect On Ghost Imaging Lidar

GONG Wenlin 1∗ , CHEN Mingliang GONG Wenlin 1∗ , CHEN Mingliang 2 , HAN Shensheng 2∗

( 1 School of Optoelectronic Science and Engineering, Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, China; 2 Key Laboratory for Quantum Optics of CAS, Shanghai Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201800, China )

Received:2022-02-18 Revised:2022-03-03 Published:2022-11-28 Online:2022-12-14

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 激光关联成像雷达是一种在凝视探测的条件下通过主动调控光场涨落和单像素探测器接收目标回波信号获取目标信息的计算成像技术, 在远距离目标识别、三维成像、要地防御等领域有着重要应用前景, 成为近年来的一个研究热点。简述了基于窄脉冲直接探测体制和基于长脉冲外差探测体制的两种激光关联成像雷达的基本原理和特点, 并介绍了其近期取得的主要研究进展。进而围绕远距离、高分辨、高速运动目标探测与识别应用, 对激光关联成像雷达所需解决的关键问题和发展趋势进行了探讨和展望。

关键词: 遥感, 成像系统, 关联成像, 激光雷达, 图像重建

Abstract: Ghost imaging lidar is a computational imaging technology that obtains the target’s information by actively modulating the fluctuation of light field and receiving the target’s echo signal with a single pixel detector in the condition of staring detection. It has important application prospects in the fields of long-distance target recognition, three-dimensional imaging and the defense of important place, and has become a research hotspot in recent years. The basic principles and characteristics of the two kinds of ghost imaging lidar based on narrow pulse direct detection system and long pulse heterodyne detection system respectively are briefly reviewed, and their recent main research progress are introduced. Furthermore, with respect to the application of long-distance, high-resolution and high-speed moving target detection and recognition, the key problems and development trend of ghost imaging lidar are discussed and prospected.

Key words: remote sensing, imaging system, ghost imaging, lidar, image reconstruction

中图分类号:

TN958

龚文林∗ , 陈明亮 , 韩申生∗. 激光关联成像雷达研究进展与展望[J]. 量子电子学报, 2022, 39(6): 835-850.

GONG Wenlin ∗ , CHEN Mingliang , HAN Shensheng ∗. Research Progress and Prospect On Ghost Imaging Lidar[J]. Chinese Journal of Quantum Electronics, 2022, 39(6): 835-850.

参考文献

[1] Shapiro J H, Capron B, Harney R. Imaging and target detection with a heterodyne-reception optical radar[J]. Applied Optics, 1981, 20(19): 3292-313.
[2] Mcmanamon P, Buell W, Choi M, et al. Laser radar: progress and opportunities in active electro-optical sensing[M]. Washington, DC: The National Academy Press, 2014.
[3] Bennink R S, Bentley S J, et al. Quantum and classical coincidence imaging[J]. Physical Review Letters, 2004, 92(3): 033601.
[4] Cheng J, Han S. Incoherent coincidence imaging and its applicability in x-ray diffraction[J]. Physical Review Letters, 2004, 92(9): 093903.
[5] Cheng J, Han S. Incoherent coincidence imaging and its applicability in x-ray diffraction[J]. Physical Review Letters, 2004, 92(9): 093903.
[6] Angelo M D, Shih Y H. Quantum imaging[J]. Laser Physics Letters, 2005, 2(12): 567-596.
[7] Shapiro J H, Boyd R W. The physics of ghost imaging[J]. Quantum Information Processing, 2012, 11(4): 949–993.
[8] Pittman T, Shih Y, Strekalov D, Sergienko A. Optical imaging by means of two-photon quantum entanglement[J]. Physical Review A, 1995, 52(5): R3429.
[9] Bennink R S, Bentley S J, Boyd R W. “Two-photon” coincidence imaging with a classical source [J]. Physical Review Letters, 2002, 89(11): 113601.
[10] Gatti A, Brambilla E, Bache M, Lugiato L A. Ghost imaging with thermal light: comparing entanglement and classical correlation[J]. Physical Review Letters, 2004, 93(9): 093602.
[11] Zhao C, Gong W, M. Chen, et al. Ghost imaging lidar via sparsity constraints[J]. Applied Physics Letters, 2012, 101(14): 141123.
[12] Gong W, Zhao C, Yu H, M. Chen, et al. Three-dimensional ghost imaging lidar via sparsity constraint[J]. Scientific Report, 2016, 6: 26133.
[13] Gong W, Yu H, Zhao C, et al. Improving the imaging quality of ghost imaging lidar via sparsity constraint by time-resolved technique[J]. Remote Sensing, 2016, 8: 991.
[14] Sun M, Edgar M, Gibson G, et al. Single-pixel three-dimensional imaging with time-based depth resolution[J]. Nature communications, 2016, 7: 12010.
[15] Yu H, Lu R, Han S, et al. Fourier-transform ghost imaging with hard x rays[J]. Physical Review Letters, 2016, 117(11): 113901.
[16] Zhang A, He Y, Wu L, et al. Tabletop x-ray ghost imaging with ultra-low radiation[J]. Optica, 2018, 5(4): 374 .
[17] Chan W L, Charan K, Takhar D, et al. A single-pixel terahertz imaging system based on compressed sensing[J]. Applied Physics Letters, 2008, 93(12): 121105.
[18] Liu H, Zhang S. Computational ghost imaging of hot objects in long-wave infrared range[J]. Applied Physics Letters, 2017, 111(3), 031110.
[19] Guo Y, He X, Wang D. A novel super-resolution imaging method based on stochastic radiation radar array[J]. Measurement science and technology, 2013, 24(7): 074013.
[20] Ryczkowski P, Barbier M, Friberg A T, et al. Ghost imaging in the time domain[J]. Nature Photonics, 2016, 10(3): 167-171.
[21] Katz O, Bromberg Y, Silberberg Y. Compressive ghost imaging[J]. Applied Physics Letters, 2009, 95(13): 131110 .
[22] Du J, Gong W, Han S. The influence of sparsity property of images on ghost imaging with thermal light[J]. Optics Letters, 2012, 37(6): 1067-1069.
[23] Gong W, Han S. High-resolution far-field ghost imaging via sparsity constraint[J]. Scientific Report, 2015, 5: 9280.
[24] Bina M, Magatti D, Molteni M, et al. Backscattering differential ghost imaging in turbid media[J]. Physical Review Letters, 2013, 110(8): 083901.
[25] Gong W, Han S. Correlated imaging in scattering media[J]. Optics. Letters, 2011, 36(3): 394-396.
[26] Chen M, Li E, Gong W, et al. Ghost imaging lidar via sparsity constraints in real atmosphere[J]. Optics and Photonics Journal, 2013, 3(2B): 83-85.
[27] Erkmen B I, Computational ghost imaging for remote sensing[J]. Journal of the optical society of America A, 2012, 29(5): 782–789.
[28] Yang X, Zhang Y, et al. Heterodyne 3D ghost imaging[J]. Optics Communications, 2016, 368: 1–6.
[29] Deng C, Gong W, Han S. Pulse-compression ghost imaging lidar via coherent detection[J]. Optics Express, 2016, 24(23): 25983-25994.
[30] Wang C, Mei X, Pan L, et al. Airborne near infrared three-dimensional ghost imaging lidar via sparsity constraint[J]. Remote Sensing, 2018, 10(5): 732.
[31] Mei X, Wang C, Pan L, et al. Experimental demonstration of vehicle-borne near infrared three-dimensional ghost imaging LiDAR[C]//2019 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO), May 5-10, 2019, San Jose, CA, USA. New York: IEEE, JW2A.7.
[32] Liu X, Shi J, Sun L, et al. Photon-limited single-pixel imaging[J]. Optics Express, 2020, 28(6): 8132-8144.
[33] Deng C, Pan L, Wang C, et al. Performance analysis of ghost imaging lidar in background light environment[J]. Photonics Research, 2017, 5(5): 431-435.
[34] Pan L, Deng C, Gong W, Han S. Influence of chirped-amplitude correlated imaging under incoherent detection[J]. Acta Optics Sinica, 2018, 38(10): 1011001 (in Chinese).
潘龙, 邓陈进, 龚文林, 韩申生. 非相干探测模式下啁啾调幅关联成像影响因素研究[J]. 光学学报, 2018, 38(10): 1011001.
[35] Pan L, Deng C, Bo Z, et al. Experimental investigation of chirped amplitude modulation heterodyne ghost imaging [J]. Optics Express, 2020, 28(14): 20808-20816.
[36] Pan L, Deng C, Gong W, Han S. Experimental demonstration of pulse-compression ghost imaging via coherent detection[J]. Proceedings of SPIE, 2020, 11567: 115670S.
[37] Gong W, Zhang P, Shen X, Han S. Ghost ‘pinhole’ imaging in Fraunhofer region[J], Applied Physics Letters, 2009, 95(7): 071110.
[38] http://defenseSystems.com/articles/2014/01/06/arl-quantum-ghost-imaging.aspx.
[39] Gong W, Zhao C, Jiao J, et al. Three-dimensional ghost imaging ladar[J]. 2013, arXiv:1301.5767 [Quant-ph].
[40] Yang Y, Shi J, Cao F, et al. Computational imaging based on time-correlated single-photon-counting technique at low light level[J], Applied Optics, 2015, 54(31): 9277-9283.
[41] Bo Z, Gong W, Yan Y, et al. Experimental research of ghost imaging based on photon counting[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2016, 43(11): 139-143(in Chinese).
薄遵望, 龚文林, 严毅, 等. 基于光子计数的关联成像实验研究[J]. 中国激光, 2016, 43(11): 139-143.
[42] Liu X, Shi J, Wu X, Zeng G. Fast first-photon ghost imaging[J]. Scientific Report, 2018, 8: 5012.
[43] Li H, Xiong J, Zeng G. Lensless ghost imaging for moving objects[J]. Optical Engineering, 2011, 50(12): 127005.
[44] Zhang C, Gong W, Han S. Ghost imaging for moving targets and its application in remote sensing[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2012, 39(12): 204-210 (in Chinese).
张聪, 龚文林, 韩申生. 运动目标强度关联成像及其在遥感探测中的应用[J]. 中国激光, 2012, 39(12): 204-210.
[45] Li E, Bo Z, Chen M, et al. Ghost imaging of a moving target with an unknown constant speed[J]. Applied Physics Letters, 2014, 104(25): 251120.
[46] Li X, Deng C, Chen M, et al. Ghost imaging for an axially moving target with an unknown constant speed[J]. Photonics Research, 2015, 3(4): 153-157.
[47] Sun S, Gu J, Lin H, et al. Gradual ghost imaging of moving objects by tracking based on cross correlation[J]. Optics Letters, 2019, 44(22): 5594-5597.
[48] Jiao S, Sun M, Gao Y, et al. Motion estimation and quality enhancement for a single image in dynamic single-pixel imaging[J]. Optics Express, 2019, 27(9): 12841-12854.
[49] Pan L, Wang Y, Deng, et al. Micro-Doppler effect based vibrating object imaging of coherent detection GISC lidar[J]. Optics Express, 2021, 29(26): 43022-43031.

激光关联成像雷达研究进展与展望

Research Progress and Prospect On Ghost Imaging Lidar

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	潘晓凯 , 姜梦杰, , 王东, , 吕旭阳, , 蓝诗琪 , , 卫英东 , , 何源, , 郭书广, , 陈平平 , 王林∗ , 陈效双 , 陆卫. 红外-太赫兹光电探测器应用及前沿变革趋势[J]. 量子电子学报, 2023, 40(2): 217-237.
[2]	郭辉∗ , 叶知秋. 随机散斑图正交优化计算鬼成像[J]. 量子电子学报, 2023, 40(1): 48-55.
[3]	郭岩, 何忆康, 李显业∗ , 孙宝清. 单像素复光场成像研究进展[J]. 量子电子学报, 2022, 39(6): 817-834.
[4]	谈志杰杨海瑞喻虹韩申生. X光强度关联衍射成像技术研究进展[J]. 量子电子学报, 2022, 39(6): 851-862.
[5]	林惠祖刘伟涛孙帅杜隆坤常宸李月刚. 关联成像算法研究进展[J]. 量子电子学报, 2022, 39(6): 863-879.
[6]	李能菲孙宇松黄见. 余弦编码复用高空间分辨率关联成像研究[J]. 量子电子学报, 2022, 39(6): 973-982.
[7]	曹也, 程亮亮, 杨昊, 方志远, 李路, 邓旭, 邢昆明, 王邦新, 谢晨波, . 基于FPGA 的激光雷达数据采集卡设计[J]. 量子电子学报, 2022, 39(4): 620-631.
[8]	李能菲, 黄见, ∗. 高空间分辨率关联成像技术研究[J]. 量子电子学报, 2022, 39(4): 549-557.
[9]	刘晨凯, 胡明勇∗, 李昭阳, 孙东起, 封志伟, 蔡晓波. 一种多波长激光雷达光学系统设计[J]. 量子电子学报, 2021, 38(6): 806-814.
[10]	李仕春, ∗, 黄祖鑫, 石东东, 辛文辉, 宋跃辉, 高飞, 华灯鑫, ∗. 机载近红外偏振激光雷达探测过冷云研究[J]. 量子电子学报, 2021, 38(6): 872-879.
[11]	成远, 张振, 华灯鑫, 宫振峰, 梅亮∗. NO₂差分吸收激光雷达技术研究进展[J]. 量子电子学报, 2021, 38(5): 580-592.
[12]	杨勇, 程学武, 杨国韬, 薛向辉, 李发泉∗. 高层大气探测激光雷达研究进展[J]. 量子电子学报, 2020, 37(5): 566-579.
[13]	储玉飞, 刘东, 王珍珠, 吴德成, 邓迁, 李路, 庄鹏, 王英俭, ∗. 多普勒测风激光雷达的基本原理与技术进展[J]. 量子电子学报, 2020, 37(5): 580-600.
[14]	任捷王晓茜高超蔡宏吉姚治海. 基于白光照明的鬼成像色彩重构[J]. 量子电子学报, 2020, 37(3): 302-308.
[15]	邵甲第, , 谢晨波, 李路, 庄鹏, 方志远, 付松琳, 曹也, 杨婧. 星载激光雷达中固态标准具的结构设计及检测[J]. 量子电子学报, 2020, 37(2): 235-241.