基于高光谱激光雷达的多视角木叶三维重建研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-5461.2024.04.010

量子电子学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (4): 659-670.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-5461.2024.04.010

基于高光谱激光雷达的多视角木叶三维重建研究

曹铮1, 邵慧1,2*, 孙龙1,2, 胡玉霞1,2, 陈杰1,2, 徐恒1,2, 陈冲1,2

( 1 安徽建筑大学电子与信息工程学院, 安徽合肥 230601; 2 安徽省古建筑智能感知与高维建模国际联合研究中心, 安徽合肥 230601 )

收稿日期:2022-05-20 修回日期:2022-05-26 出版日期:2024-07-28 发布日期:2024-07-28
通讯作者: E-mail: shaohui@ahjzu.edu.cn E-mail:E-mail: shaohui@ahjzu.edu.cn
作者简介:曹铮 ( 1996 - ), 安徽安庆人, 研究生, 主要从事雷达信号处理方面的研究。E-mail: 2455373203@qq.com
基金资助:
红外与低温等离子体安徽省重点实验室开放课题 (IRKL2023KF04), 安徽省住房城乡建设科学技术计划项目 (2022-YF077), 浙江省海洋大数据挖掘与应用重点实验室开放课题 (OBDMA202103), 安徽省高校省级自然科学研究项目 (2023AH050181, KJ2021JD16)

Research of multi‑view wood‑leaf 3D reconstruction based on hyperspectral lidar

CAO Zheng1 , SHAO Hui 1,2*, SUN Long1,2 , HU Yuxia1,2 , CHEN Jie1,2 , XU Heng1,2 , CHEN Chong1,2

( 1 School of Electronic and Information Engineering, Anhui Jianzhu University, Hefei 230601, China; 2 Anhui International Joint Research Center for Ancient Architecture Intellisencing and Multi-Dimensional Modeling, Hefei 230601, China )

Received:2022-05-20 Revised:2022-05-26 Published:2024-07-28 Online:2024-07-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： : 高光谱激光雷达 (HSL) 能实现空间-光谱信息的同步采集, 为树木的木叶三维重建提供了可能。利用自研的 HSL系统获取不同视角的树木点云数据, 进行了多视角下的木叶分离，并根据分离结果完成了的木叶三维重建。针对传统最近邻迭代 (ICP) 算法严格的点云初始条件需求, 提出了改进的点云配准方法。首先, 采用快速点特征直方图 (FPFH) 描述点云的局部特征, 然后基于随机抽样一致性 (RANSAC) 算法实现不同视角点云的粗配准, 最后利用 ICP算法实现精配准。在选出特征通道的基础上, 利用随机森林 (RF) 和支持向量机 (SVM) 完成木叶分离, 最终完成木叶三维重建。实验表明, 在15°和30°的视角差下, 提出的改进点云配准方法均达到较好的配准精度, 同时基于特征通道选择的RF方法木叶分离准确度分别达到98.17%和98.87%。

关键词: 遥感, 高光谱激光雷达, 空间-光谱信息, 三维重建

Abstract: Hyperspectral lidar (HSL) can obtain spatial and spectral information simultaneously, which provides more possibilities for three-dimention (3D) reconstruction of wood-leaf. The multi-view tree point clouds were collected using a self-developed HSL system for wood-leaf separation and 3D reconstruction. In order to meet the strict condition of traditional iterative closest point (ICP) algorithm, an improved point cloud registration method was proposed in this work. Firstly, the local feature of every point was described using fast point feature histogram (FPFH). Then, rough and accurate registration of point clouds were successively conducted based on random sample consensus (RANSAC) algorithm and ICP algorithm respectively. Finally, the wood and leaf components were separated based on the spectral data of the registered point clouds, the feature bands were extracted for wood and leaf separation on the basis of the spectral feature channel selection with random forest (RF) algorithm and support vector machine (SVM) algorithm, and 3D reconstruction of wood-leaf components was completed based on separation under different view. The experiment results show that the proposed improved point cloud registration method can achieve excellent registration accuracy both under 15° and 30° view angle difference, and the corresponding separation accuracy using RF algorithm based on feature channel selection reaches 98.17% and 98.87%, respectively.

Key words: remote sensing, hyperspectral lidar, spatial-spectral information, 3D reconstruction

中图分类号:

TP391

曹铮, 邵慧, 孙龙, 胡玉霞, 陈杰, 徐恒, 陈冲, . 基于高光谱激光雷达的多视角木叶三维重建研究[J]. 量子电子学报, 2024, 41(4): 659-670.

CAO Zheng , SHAO Hui , SUN Long, , HU Yuxia, , CHEN Jie, , XU Heng, , CHEN Chong, . Research of multi‑view wood‑leaf 3D reconstruction based on hyperspectral lidar[J]. Chinese Journal of Quantum Electronics, 2024, 41(4): 659-670.

参考文献

[1]Sean M.McMahon, Geoffrey G. Parker, Dawn R.Miller. .Evidence for a recent increase in forest growth[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2010, 107(8): 3611-3615.
[2]Malhi Y, Jackson T, Patrick Bentley L, et al. New perspectives on the ecology of tree structure and tree communities through terrestrial laser scanning[J]. Interface Focus. 2018, 8(2): 20170052.
[3]Besl Paul, McKay H.D.. A method for registration of 3-D shapes[J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 1992, 14: 239-256.
[4]Shi Xiaojing, Tao Liu, Han Xie. Improved Iterative Closest Point(ICP) 3D point cloud registration algorithm based on point cloud filtering and adaptive fireworks for coarse registration[J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing. 2020, 41: 197-3220.
[5]Liu Haibo, Liu Tianran, Li Yapeng, et al. Point cloud registration based on MCMC-SA ICP algorithm[J]. IEEE Access. 2019, 7: 73637-73648.
[6]M.Lamine Tazir, Tawsif Gokhool, ChecchinPaul, et al. CICP: Cluster Iterative Closest Point for Sparse-Dense Point Cloud Registration[J]. Robotics and Autonomous Systems. 2018, 108: 66-86.
[7]Yang Jiaolong, li Hongdong, Jia, Yunde. Go-ICP: Solving 3D Registration Efficiently and Globally Optimally[C]. 2013 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, 2013, 1457-1464.
[8]Li Shihua, Wang Jingxian, Liang Zuqin, et al. Tree point clouds registration using an improved ICP algorithm based on kd-tree[C]. 2016 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS). 2016, 4545-4548.
[9]Nan Geng, Xu Jiang, Feng Xuemei, et al. Registration of Botanic Tree Point Cloud Based on Pseudo Feature Point[C]. 2019 Nicograph International (NicoInt). 2019, 94-101.
[10]Ma Lixia, Zheng Guang, Eitel Jan, et al. Improved Salient Feature-Based Approach for Automatically Separating Photosynthetic and Nonphotosynthetic Components Within Terrestrial Lidar Point Cloud Data of Forest Canopies[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. 2016, 54(2): 679-696.
[11]Wang Di, Hollaus M., Pfeifer Norbert. Feasibility of Machine Learning Methods for Separation Wood and Leaf Points from Terrestrial Laser Scanning Data[J]. Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. 2017, 157-164.
[12]Vicari Matheus B.,Disney Mathias,Wilkes Phil, et al. Leaf and wood classification framework for terrestrial LiDAR point clouds[J]. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 2019,10(5):680-694.
[13]Moorthy Sruthi, Calders Kim, Boni Vicari, et al. Improved Supervised Learning-Based Approach for Leaf and Wood Classification From LiDAR Point Clouds of Forests[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. 2020,58(5):1-14.
[14]Douglas Ewan, Strahler Alan, Martel Jason, et al. DWEL: A Dual-Wavelength Echidna Lidar for ground-based forest scanning[C]. 2012 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS). 2012, 4998 -5001.
[15]Danson Francis, Gaulton Rachel, Armitage Richard, et al. Developing a dual-wavelength full-waveform terrestrial laser scanner to characterize forest canopy structure[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. 2014, 198: 7–14.
[16]Danson Francis, Sasse Fadal, Schofield Lucy. Spectral and spatial information from a novel dual-wavelength full-waveform terrestrial laser scanner for forest ecology[J]. Interface Focus. 2018, 8(2): 20170049.
[17]Steven Hancock, Rachel Gaulton, F. Mark Danson. Angular Reflectance of Leaves With a Dual-Wavelength Terrestrial Lidar and Its Implications for Leaf-Bark Separation and Leaf Moisture Estimation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. 2017, 55(6): 3084-3090.
[18]Xi Zhu, Andrew Skidmore, Roshanak Darvishzadeh,et al. Foliar and woody materials discriminated using terrestrial LiDAR in a mixed natural forest[J]. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation. 2018, 64: 43-50.
[19]Shao Hui, Sa BeiNing, Li Wei, et al. A design and implementation of full-waveform Hyperspectral LiDAR for ancient architecture modelling. Infrared and Laser Engineering. 2022. (in Chinese)
邵慧, 撒贝宁, 李伟, 等. 一种适用于古建筑建模的全波形高光谱激光雷达设计与实现[J]. 红外与激光工程, 2022.
[20]Chen Yuwei, Li Wei, Hyypp? Juha, et al. A 10-nm Spectral Resolution Hyperspectral LiDAR System Based on an Acousto-Optic Tunable Filter. Sensors. 2019, 19(7): 1620.
[21]Hu Peilun, Chen Yuwei, Jiang Changhui, et al. Spectral Observation and Classification of Typical Tree Species Leaves Based on Indoor Hyperspectral LiDAR[J]. Journal of Infrared and Millimeter Waves. 2020, 39(03): 372-380. (in Chinese)
胡佩纶,陈育伟,蒋长辉,等.基于室内高光谱激光雷达的典型树种叶片光谱观测和分类[J].红外与毫米波学报,2020,39(03):372-380.
[22]Radu Bogdan Rusu, Nico Blodow, M.ichael Beetz. Fast Point Feature Histograms (FPFH) for 3D registration[C]. 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. 2009, 3212-3217.
[23]Bezerra Saldanha, Galv?o Roberto, Yoneyama Takashi, et al. The successive projections algorithm for variable selection in spectroscopic multicomponent analysis[J]. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems. 2001, 57: 65-73.
[24]Shao Hui, Cao Zheng, Li Wei, et al. Feasibility Study of Wood-Leaf Separation Based on Hyperspectral LiDAR Technology in Indoor Circumstances[J]. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing. 2022, 15: 729-738.

基于高光谱激光雷达的多视角木叶三维重建研究

Research of multi‑view wood‑leaf 3D reconstruction based on hyperspectral lidar

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	胡春晖 , 张黎明 , 李鑫 . 基于光谱分解和PSOBP组合模型的光谱重构研究[J]. 量子电子学报, 2024, 41(1): 47-56.
[2]	康祝海, 李新, 刘恩超, 张权, 郑小兵 . 高空光谱辐亮度仪的光机设计与实验分析[J]. 量子电子学报, 2023, 40(6): 888-898.
[3]	邵慧, 马万里, 曹铮, 李伟, 杨丽娟, 肖晓, 陈杰, . 一种基于高光谱激光雷达技术的涂改车牌识别方法[J]. 量子电子学报, 2023, 40(5): 770-779.
[4]	潘晓凯 , 姜梦杰, , 王东, , 吕旭阳, , 蓝诗琪 , , 卫英东 , , 何源, , 郭书广, , 陈平平 , 王林∗ , 陈效双 , 陆卫. 红外-太赫兹光电探测器应用及前沿变革趋势[J]. 量子电子学报, 2023, 40(2): 217-237.
[5]	龚文林∗ , 陈明亮 , 韩申生∗. 激光关联成像雷达研究进展与展望[J]. 量子电子学报, 2022, 39(6): 835-850.
[6]	李仕春, ∗, 黄祖鑫, 石东东, 辛文辉, 宋跃辉, 高飞, 华灯鑫, ∗. 机载近红外偏振激光雷达探测过冷云研究[J]. 量子电子学报, 2021, 38(6): 872-879.
[7]	储玉飞, 刘东, 王珍珠, 吴德成, 邓迁, 李路, 庄鹏, 王英俭, ∗. 多普勒测风激光雷达的基本原理与技术进展[J]. 量子电子学报, 2020, 37(5): 580-600.
[8]	张爱明秦慧杰欧阳晓. 一种面向对象的光谱分量替换变化检测方法[J]. 量子电子学报, 2019, 36(6): 658-662.
[9]	徐海东1,2, 张艳娜1, 张运杰1, 李新1, 黄雄豪1,2, 侯志宽1,2, 郑小兵1. 地基月球自动观测辐射仪的跟踪系统设计[J]. 量子电子学报, 2019, 36(5): 605-611.
[10]	王浩1，2，秦来安1，靖旭1，何枫1，谭逢富1，侯再红1. 基于光谱分析的罂粟识别研究[J]. 量子电子学报, 2019, 36(2): 151-155.
[11]	田禹泽1,2，王煜2，*，赵欣2，黄书华2，常振2，邱晓晗2. 一种长周期和大倍频系数条件下的数字锁相环[J]. 量子电子学报, 2019, 36(2): 168-173.
[12]	牛明慧1, 2，陈福春1*，陈桂林1. 静止轨道遥感仪器可见光通道月球定标方法研究[J]. 量子电子学报, 2019, 36(1): 108-115.
[13]	许和鱼1,2,3, 张黎明2,3, 司孝龙2,3, 徐伟伟2,3, . 太阳衰减屏的设计及性能评估[J]. 量子电子学报, 2018, 35(3): 359-365.
[14]	杜洋华灯鑫辛文辉何廷尧崔岩普亚洲. 大气探测激光雷达发射能量监测[J]. J4, 2018, 35(2): 209-215.
[15]	龙虎1，刘昊炜1，李志伟2，李文彩1，姚波1, 熊伟2，毛庆和1. 用于空间外差光谱仪光谱定标的窄线宽可调谐光纤激光器[J]. J4, 2017, 34(3): 339-343.