量子电子学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (3): 337-352.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-5461.2026.03.002

• 综述 • 上一篇    下一篇

水下图像增强研究进展综述

向 丹 1,2, 周泽彬 2, 高 攀 3*   

  1. 1 广州航海学院计算机学院, 广东 广州 510725; 2 广东技术师范大学电子与信息学院, 广东 广州 510665;3 广东技术师范大学工业中心, 广东 广州 510665
  • 收稿日期:2024-06-17 修回日期:2024-10-23 出版日期:2026-05-28 发布日期:2026-05-28
  • 通讯作者: gaopan@gpnu.edu.cn E-mail:gaopan@gpnu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:周泽彬 ( 1998 - ), 广东汕头人, 研究生, 主要从事水下图像增强方面的研究。E-mail: 2310514443@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    2022年度广州市教育局高校科研项目 (202234607), 2023年度广东省普通高校重点领域专项 (2023ZDZX3017)

A review of advances in underwater image enhancement

XIANG Dan 1,2 , ZHOU Zebin 2 , GAO Pan 3*   

  1. 1 School of Computer Science and Information Engineering, Guangzhou Maritime University, Guangzhou 510725, China;2 School of Electronics and Information, Guangdong Polytechnic Normal University, Guangzhou 510665, China; 3 Guangdong Industrial Training Center, Guangdong Polytechnic Normal University, Guangzhou 510665, China
  • Received:2024-06-17 Revised:2024-10-23 Published:2026-05-28 Online:2026-05-28

摘要: 水下图像增强技术因其在海洋勘探、水下机器人作业及水下监控系统等领域的广泛应用而成为研究热点。水下环境的复杂性, 如光照的不均匀性、光的散射与吸收等, 常导致图像出现对比度低、细节模糊及色彩失真等问题, 严重降低了图像的可视性与可解释性。为应对上述挑战, 科研人员提出了多种增强策略, 旨在提升水下图像的质量, 使其更适用于视觉分析与自动化处理。本文系统综述了近年来该领域的研究进展, 将现有技术体系划分为三大类:物理模型、非物理模型与深度学习方法。其中, 物理模型方法通过构建水下成像过程的物理模型, 精确估计场景参数, 典型代表包括Jaffe-McGlamery模型与暗通道先验(DCP)模型等; 非物理模型方法则不依赖对物理过程的深入理解, 而是采用直方图均衡化、小波变换等技术, 在空间域或变换域中对图像进行增强; 深度学习方法则利用卷积神经网络(CNN)和生成对抗网络(GAN)等框架, 通过学习大量数据中的图像特征, 显著提升图像质量。此外, 本文还对当前常用的水下图像质量的主客观评价体系及具体指标进行了全面的梳理与总结。最后, 本文对水下图像增强领域亟待解决的关键问题进行了探讨, 并对未来技术的发展趋势进行了展望。随着海洋探索的不断深入与水下技术的快速发展, 水下图像增强技术有望取得更多突破, 为海洋环境的高效探测及深远海资源的开发奠定坚实基础。

关键词: 水下图像增强, 深度学习, 图像增强方法, 评价体系

Abstract: Underwater image enhancement technology has become a research hotspot due to its extensive applications in fields such as marine exploration, underwater robotics, and underwater monitoring systems. However, the complexity of underwater environments, such as uneven lighting, light scattering and absorption, often leads to images with low contrast, blurred details, and color distortion, which significantly reduces the visibility and interpretability of images. To address these challenges, researchers have proposed a variety of enhancement strategies aimed at improving the quality of underwater images to make them more suitable for visual analysis and automated processing. This article systematically reviews the recent research progress in the field of underwater image enhancement, categorizing these methods into three types: physical model methods, non-physical model methods, and deep learning methods. Among them, physical model methods construct a physical model of underwater imaging process, such as the Jaffe-McGlamery model and the dark channel prior (DCP) model, to accurately estimate scene parameters. Non-physical model methods do not rely on an in-depth understan ding of physical processes. Instead, they employ techniques such as histogram equalization and wavelet transform to enhance images through operations in the spatial domain or transform domain. Deep learning methods utilize frameworks such as convolutional neural networks (CNN) and generative adversarial networks (GAN) to significantly improve image quality by learning image features from a large amount of data. In addition, this paper comprehensively reviews and summarizes the currently commonly used subjective and objective evaluation systems as well as specific indicators for underwater image quality. Finally, this paper provides an in-depth analysis of the current challenges faced in the field of underwater image enhancement technology, and looks forward to the development trends of future research directions. It is believed that with the continuous advancement of marine exploration and underwater technology, underwater image enhancement technology is expected to achieve more breakthroughs in the future, providing a stronger technical support for humanity to understand and develop marine resources.

Key words: underwater image enhancement, deep learning, image enhancement methods, evaluation system

中图分类号: