腔增强拉曼光谱方法检测痕量氢气

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-5461.2021.05.011

量子电子学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (5): 669-676.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-5461.2021.05.011

• “激光光谱新技术与应用”专辑 • 上一篇下一篇

腔增强拉曼光谱方法检测痕量氢气

仰青颖1, 程存峰1;2, 孙羽1;2, 刘安雯1;2, 胡水明1;2∗

1 中国科学技术大学合肥微尺度物理科学国家实验室, 安徽合肥 230026; 2 中国科学技术大学中国科学院量子信息与量子物理卓越创新中心, 安徽合肥 230026

收稿日期:2021-05-17 修回日期:2021-06-25 出版日期:2021-09-28 发布日期:2021-09-28
通讯作者: E-mail: smhu@ustc.edu.cn E-mail:smhu@ustc.edu.cn
作者简介:仰青颖 ( 1996 - ), 女, 安徽人, 博士生, 主要从事分子光谱精密测量方面的研究。 E-mail: yqy9615@mail.ustc.edu.cn
基金资助:
Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (国家自然科学基金, 21688102)

Cavity-enhanced Raman spectroscopy for trace hydrogen gas sensing

YANG Qingying1, CHENG Cunfeng1;2, SUN Yu1;2, LIU Anwen1;2, HU Shuiming1;2∗

1 Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at Microscale, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China; 2 CAS Center for Excellence in Quantum Information and Quantum Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China

Received:2021-05-17 Revised:2021-06-25 Published:2021-09-28 Online:2021-09-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 氢气作为潜在的能源载体和工业材料，在众多领域发挥着日益重要的作用。在很多应用中, 对氢气的检测需要有更高的灵敏度、更快的响应和更大的动态测量范围。腔增强拉曼光谱法 (CERS) 通过 Pound-DreverHall (PDH) 稳频技术将激光和高精细度的光学谐振腔锁定, 实现了 1900 倍的腔内功率增益, 用于痕量氢气的检测。在 7 mW 的激光输入功率下, 当积分时间为 100 s 时, 自行搭建的腔增强拉曼光谱装置对 H2 的检测限为 2 Pa。实验结果还表明拉曼散射强度与激光功率和气体压力具有良好的线性关系, 示范了 CERS 方法高精度气体定量分析的潜力。

关键词: 光谱学, 痕量气体检测, 腔增强拉曼光谱, 氢气, 光学谐振腔, Pound-Drever-Hall 技术

Abstract: As a potential energy carrier and industrial material, the increasing importance of hydrogen calls for trace gas detection technique with higher sensitivity, faster response and wider dynamic measurement range. Based on the Pound-Drever-Hall (PDH) laser frequency stabilization technique, laser is coupled into a high-finesse optical resonant cavity in cavity-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (CERS) system, resulting in a power gain factor of 1900 for trace hydrogen gas sensing. With 7 mW input laser power and 100 s exposure time, a detection limit of 2 Pa for hydrogen gas is achieved for the home-made CERS system. Measurements also show that the signal of Raman scattering has an excellent linear relationship with the gas pressure and laser power, which indicates CERS has the potential for quantitative analysis of gases with high precision.

Key words: spectroscopy, trace gas detection, cavity-enhanced Raman spectroscopy, hydrogen, optical resonant cavity, Pound-Drever-Hall technique

中图分类号:

O431.2

仰青颖, 程存峰, 孙羽, 刘安雯, 胡水明, ∗. 腔增强拉曼光谱方法检测痕量氢气[J]. 量子电子学报, 2021, 38(5): 669-676.

YANG Qingying, CHENG Cunfeng, SUN Yu, LIU Anwen, HU Shuiming, ∗. Cavity-enhanced Raman spectroscopy for trace hydrogen gas sensing[J]. Chinese Journal of Quantum Electronics, 2021, 38(5): 669-676.

参考文献

[1]Balat M.Potential importance of hydrogen as a future solution to environmental and transportation problems[J].International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2008, 33(15):4013-4029 [2]Shafeen Z A.A novel process integration,optimization and design approach for large-scale implementation of oxy-fired coal power plants with CO2 capture[J].International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2007, 1(1):47-57 [3] Tripathi M M, Eseller K E, Yueh F Y, et al.An optical sensor for multi-species impurity monitoring in hydrogen fuel[J]. [J].Sensors & Actuators B Chemical, 2012, 171-172:416-422 [4]Buttner W J, Post M B, Burgess R, et al.An overview of hydrogen safety sensors and requirements[J].International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2011, 36(3):2462-2470 [5]Spencer C L, Watson V, Hippler M.Trace gas detection of molecular hydrogen H2 by photoacoustic stimulated Raman spectroscopy (PARS)[J].Analyst, 2012, 137(6):1384-1388 [6] Traidia A, Chatzidouros E, Jouiad M.Review of hydrogen-assisted cracking models for application to service lifetime prediction and challenges in the oil and gas industry[J]. Corrosion Reviews, 2018. [7]Smith T W, Hippler M.Cavity-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy in the Biosciences: In situ,Multicomponent and Isotope Selective Gas Measurements to Study Hydrogen Production and Consumption by Escherichia coli[J].Analytical Chemistry, 2017, 89(3):2147-2154 [8]Stefan, Hanf, Timea, et al.Fast and Highly Sensitive Fiber-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopic Monitoring of Molecular H2 and CH4 for Point-of-Care Diagnosis of Malabsorption Disorders in Exhaled Human Breath[J].Analytical Chemistry, 2014, 87(2):982-988 [9]Sieburg, Anne, Schneider, et al.Monitoring of gas composition in a laboratory biogas plant using cavity enhanced Raman spectroscopy[J].The Analyst: The Analytical Journal of the Royal Society of Chemistry: A Monthly International Publication Dealing with All Branches of Analytical Chemistry, 2018, 143(6):1285-1504 [10]Wang P, Chen W, Wang J, et al.Multigas Analysis by Cavity-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy for Power Transformer Diagnosis[J].Analytical Chemistry, 2020, 92(8):5969-5977 [11]E Matisová, S Hrouzkov.Analysis of Endocrine Disrupting Pesticides by Capillary GC with Mass Spectrometric Detection[J].International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2012, 9(9):3166-3196 [12] Yang Y, Lin M, Tang J, et al.Derivatization gas chromatography negative chemical ionization mass spectrometry for the analysis of trace organic pollutants and their metabolites in human biological samples[J]. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 2020. [13]Wang C, Sahay P.Breath Analysis Using Laser Spectroscopic Techniques: Breath Biomarkers,Spectral Fingerprints,and Detection Limits[J].Sensors, 2009, 9(10):8230-8262 [14]Lackner M.Tunable Diode Laser Absorption Spectroscopy (TDLAS) in the Process Industries–a Review[J].Reviews in Chemical Engineering, 2007, 23(2):65- [15]Martin N A, Ferracci V, Cassidy N, et al.The application of a cavity ring-down spectrometer to measurements of ambient ammonia using traceable primary standard gas mixtures[J].Applied Physics B, 2016, 122(8):219- [16]Crosson E R.A cavity ring-down analyzer for measuring atmospheric levels of methane,carbon dioxide,and water vapor[J].Applied Physics B, 2008, 92(3):403-408 [17] Mazurenka M.Cavity Ring-Down and Cavity Enhanced Spectroscopy Using Diode Lasers[J]. Annu. Rep. Sect. C (Phys. Chem.), 2005, 101. [18] Haken.Molecular Physics and Elements of Quantum Chemistry: Introduction to Experiments and Theory[M]. World Publishing Corporation, 1999. [19]Wang P, Chen W, Wan F, et al.Cavity-enhanced Raman spectroscopy with optical feedback frequency-locking for gas sensing[J].Optics Express, 2019, 27(23):33312- [20]Righettoni M, Tricoli A, Pratsinis S E.Si:WO3 Sensors for Highly Selective Detection of Acetone for Easy Diagnosis of Diabetes by Breath Analysis[J].Analytical Chemistry, 2010, 82(9):3581-7 [21] Kneer J, Knobelspies S, Bierer B, et al.New method to selectively determine hydrogen sulfide concentrations using CuO layers[J]. Sensors & Actuators B Chemical, 2015, 222:625-631. [22]Wang P, Chen W, Wan F, et al.A review of cavity-enhanced Raman spectroscopy as a gas sensing method[J].Applied Spectroscopy Reviews, 2019, 14(2):1-25 [23] MD Morris, Be Rger A, Mahadevanjansen A.Infrared and Raman Spectroscopy[J]. Marcel Dekker, 1976. [24]Leru E C, Blackie.E,Meyer M,et alSurface Enhanced Raman Scattering Enhancement Factors: A Comprehensive Study[J].Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2007, 111(37):13794-13803 [25] Knebl A, D Yan, Popp J, et al.Fiber Enhanced Raman Gas Spectroscopy[J]. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 2017, 103:230-238. [26]Qi Y, Zhao Y, Bao H, et al.Nanofiber enhanced stimulated Raman spectroscopy for ultra-fast,ultra-sensitive hydrogen detection with ultra-wide dynamic range[J].Optica, 2019, 6(5):570- [27]Zaitsu S I, Imasaka T.Intracavity Phase-matched Coherent Anti-stokes Raman Spectroscopy for Trace Gas Detection[J].Analytical Sciences, 2014, 30(1):75-79 [28]Kerdoncuff H, Lassen M, Petersen J C.Continuous-wave coherent Raman spectroscopy for improving the accuracy of Raman shifts[J].Optics Letters, 2019, 44(20):5057- [29]Nur, Ismail, Cristine, et al.Fabry-Pérot resonator: spectral line shapes,generic and related Airy distributions,linewidths,finesses,and performance at low or frequency-dependent reflectivity[J].Optics Express, 2016, 24(15):16366-16389 [30]Lee, Weller, Maxim, et al.Gas-phase Raman spectroscopy of non-reacting flows: comparison between free-space and cavity-based spontaneous Raman emission[J].Applied Optics, 2019, 58(10):92-103 [31]Taylor D J, Glugla M, Penzhorn R D.Enhanced Raman sensitivity using an actively stabilized external resonator[J].Review of Scientific Instruments, 2001, 72(4):1970-1976 [32] Hippler M.Cavity-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy of Natural Gas with Optical Feedback cw-Diode Lasers[J]. Analytical Chemistry, 2015, 87(15). [33]Black E D.An introduction to Pound–Drever–Hall laser frequency stabilization[J].American Journal of Physics, 2000, 69(1):79-87 [34]Long-Sheng, Ma, Jun, et al.Ultrasensitive frequency-modulation spectroscopy enhanced by a high-finesse optical cavity: theory and application to overtone transitions of C2H2 and C2HD[J].Journal of the Optical Society of America B, 1999, 16(12):2255-2268 [35]Fenner, Wayne R, Hyatt, et al.Raman cross section of some simple gases[J].Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1973, 63(1):73-77

腔增强拉曼光谱方法检测痕量氢气

Cavity-enhanced Raman spectroscopy for trace hydrogen gas sensing

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	陈珂马凤翔赵跃李辰溪安冉朱峰杭忱. 基于光纤光声传感的油中溶解气体分析系统[J]. 量子电子学报, 2023, 40(4): 597-605.
[2]	曹冬梅, 李永放 . 领结状金纳米二聚体耦合共振特性研究[J]. 量子电子学报, 2023, 40(4): 606-613.
[3]	费晔, 孙仲谋, 田东鹏, 刘骁源, 刘玉柱, . 基于激光诱导击穿光谱的果木炭燃烧对空气成分影响的研究[J]. 量子电子学报, 2023, 40(4): 436-446.
[4]	王海青 , 施卫 . THz-ATR 技术检测生物医学样品的研究进展[J]. 量子电子学报, 2023, 40(3): 319-332.
[5]	曾子威 , 李宏光 , 郭宇烽 , 廖文焘 . 隐匿危险品高准确度太赫兹光谱识别方法[J]. 量子电子学报, 2023, 40(3): 340-348.
[6]	白岩冰, 张梦圆, 朱梦琪, 李旭, 闫佳玉, 张存林, 左剑, . α-乳糖一水合物太赫兹动力学研究[J]. 量子电子学报, 2023, 40(3): 349-359.
[7]	葛宏义 , 王飞 , 蒋玉英 , 李丽 , 张元 , 贾柯柯 , . 基于宽度学习的太赫兹光谱图像小麦霉变识别研究[J]. 量子电子学报, 2023, 40(3): 360-368.
[8]	张冉冉 , 应璐娜 , 周卫东. 相关向量机结合主成分分析应用于 LIBS 技术定量分析[J]. 量子电子学报, 2023, 40(3): 376-382.
[9]	杨金, , 王云峰, , 储玲巧 , 蒋华超 , 苏付海 ∗. 少层 PtSe2 中光生载流子超快动力学研究[J]. 量子电子学报, 2023, 40(2): 282-292.
[10]	王泽育, 崔琪, 和小虎, 卢丹华, 邱选兵何秋生, 赖云忠, 李传亮∗. I₂⁺离子低能电子态的计算和光谱研究[J]. 量子电子学报, 2022, 39(4): 477-484.
[11]	徐鹏, 贾韧, 姚关心, 秦正波, 郑贤锋, 杨新艳, 崔执凤, . 混合水溶液中金属元素的偏最小二乘法激光诱导击穿光谱[J]. 量子电子学报, 2022, 39(4): 485-493.
[12]	于玮, 周卓彦, 孙仲谋, 张兴龙, 刘玉柱, . 激光诱导击穿光谱技术实时检测蔷薇属植物[J]. 量子电子学报, 2022, 39(4): 494-501.
[13]	丁伯坤, 邵李刚, 王坤阳, 陈家金, 王贵师, 刘锟, 梅教旭, 谈图, 高晓明, ∗. 基于离轴积分腔的海水溶解气体实时检测技术研究[J]. 量子电子学报, 2022, 39(4): 502-510.
[14]	马凤翔, 赵跃, 崔方晓∗, 李大成. 基于支持向量回归的光声光谱信号温度和湿度校正方法[J]. 量子电子学报, 2022, 39(4): 511-518.
[15]	张云琪, 崔超远, 陈永, 鲁翠萍. 苹果酸度可见-近红外无损测定模型设计与优化[J]. 量子电子学报, 2022, 39(4): 531-540.